From Orly:Thank you and let’s keep working

Posted March 15th, 2009 by restore

Thank you and let’s keep working until Obama resigns or until he is removed.
Thank you all for your beautiful, warm words of support. It really touched my heart to read some 160 comments that were posted so far. Thank you for your prayers. Those kept me safe so far and hopefully will keep me safe in the future. It is interesting that completely deranged Obama thugs are now posting messages on the blogs saying that this meeting never happened and Roberts doesn’t have Secret Service protection. It is particularly laughable in light of the fact that their own leftist liberal newspaper Seattle Observer posted an article confirming the event, my presence there, my plea to Roberts and his request to give the papers to his Secret Service. (it is on this blog below). Albeit they twisted my words and the reaction of the audience, they confirmed that I was there, they stated that I have brought documents of Obama’s lack of eligibility and letters of half a million citizens and Roberts told me to give the documents to the Secret Service.
After the event a number of students and professors have approached me and stated that it was an example of devotion and zealous advocacy, they commended me on it, they have given me their names and asked how can they help. Most of them stated that I had more guts then 99 percent of the people.
We have to move on and continue our research, lobbying politicians and demanding action from our law enforcement and judiciary. Please, let’s work together to end this nightmare of illegal and criminal activity, surrounding Obama, as soon as possible:
1. I need your help in sending by certified mail with my return address letters to Attorney Generals of each state, demanding immediate criminal investigation, Grand Jury and subpoena of records
2. Demanding quo warranto proceedings by every US attorney and criminal investigation, Grand Jury and subpoenas
3. Demand Judicial hearings and subpoena of records by the State and US Representatives and Senators.
4. Looking for decent judges with some guts that would issue subpoenas
5. Federal employees joining us and requesting that all of their federal agencies demand Obama’s proof odf qualification or immediate resignation or removal, as Federal employees cannot be true to their oath to uphold the Constitution with Foreign National usurping the White House
6. Each and every member of the military should write 138 grievance to Secretary Gates, Chief of Staff Mullen and all their commanding officers, demanding that Obama proves his qualifications or is removed from the position of Commander in Chief ASAP .
7. I need to get in touch with Martin Didier that has written articles in Chicago about the mob laundering stolen or otherwise illegal money through fictitious mortgages. that might explain all of the fictitious addresses and social security numbers for Obama in databases
8.I need to get in touch with people running Intelius, Jobs.com, Lexis Nexis and Choice Point. I need to get info on how do they collect data, from what sources.
9. I need as many articles as possible about 3 or 4 gay men, members of Trinity church that were found shot to death in a period of 45 days in the beginning of Democrat primary November-December 2007.
10. I need info on Magic Plumbing aka Burlew Plumbing and the lean they had on the house of Kelly Mc Crum Robinson- Michelle Obama’s sister in law. I also need actual news paper articles about Magic Plumbing doing maintenance of sprinkler system in the World trade Center on 09.05.2001 and the articles from Nashville TN news papers about one of Magic Plumbing employees being arrested with a person working in the Nashville TN DMV who was accused of issuing fraudulent drivers licenses. (a woman, that later died under questionable circumstances).
Please move fast, material is being scrubbed of the Internet awfully fast, you may need to go to the libraries and get actual papers or go to state and National Archives.
Together we can end this nightmare soon.
Thank you again for all your help, Orly

The WHY Initiative

Posted March 9th, 2009 by restore

There once existed a “fringe movement” comprised of people who were publicly ridiculed for their specific and firmly held conviction—a conviction that ran counter to the generally held beliefs of their time. As staunchly as they embraced what they knew to be truth, it seemed no less than futility trying to sway the vast majority to accept, or even consider, that knowledge. The institutions that controlled the dissemination of public information condemned these “truth bearers” as unworthy of the slightest civility. It even became dangerous to attempt to convince the masses that these contentions were, in fact, truth—so dangerous that one of the group’s leaders was eventually imprisoned for openly sharing his viewpoint, and then placed under house arrest for the remainder of his years.

Is this how history will recall us—the “birthers” of the early 21 century? If it is, then it will likely be part of the account describing America’s demise. This portrayal certainly looks accurate regarding what we’ve experienced, except for the leader’s imprisonment. But, the “leader” to whom I am referring was Galileo Galilei, and the fringe movement of his day was the heliocentrists—those who believed the earth orbited the sun, and not the other way around. Just because society considers beliefs that run counter to the understandings of the gullible masses to be “fringe” or “conspiracy theories,” doesn’t mean that those beliefs are not true. The earth continues to orbit the sun.

There is a group of people, who rely on us to retain their jobs, who have still not provided truthful, informed answers to our questions about Mr. Obama’s eligibility to be president—the members of Congress. While a very nasty bug has kept me pretty silent for more than a couple weeks, I feel I have now recovered enough to once again remember just how angry it makes me that these folks have arrogantly dismissed us as lunatics—and they are supposed to be working FOR us!

So, The WHY Initiative is now being implemented in full force. Citizen Wells and I finalized it today, and we are ready to begin a new barrage of inquiries into the offices of our elected officials in Congress.

Here’s what we’re asking you to do: call, write, email, and/or visit the U.S. Representatives and Senators in YOUR state only. Believe me, since they view getting re-elected as their most important job, they are really only concerned with keeping their constituents happy. It does very little for someone in Ohio to contact an elected official in Kentucky—there’s no vote involved there, so the Ohioan means nothing to the Kentucky official.

We’re NOT asking for them to send you an answer to your request—we’ve already been sickened enough by their moronic lies. No, all we’d like you to request of them is to enter into a dialogue with the representatives of our movement. Citizen Wells and I will determine who will speak with any of them who appear willing. In that dialogue, the question to which we’ll be trying to obtain an answer will be “Why didn’t you ask for proof that Barack Obama is a natural born citizen?” We know they just HAD to have had a reason. We’d now like to know what it was.

Here is a sample letter you can cut and paste, or you can take the specifics of it and write your own letter.

**********************************
Dear [Elected Official],

As you undoubtedly know, there are many people across the country who are aware and disturbed that Barack Obama has refused to provide proper documentation to prove he is a natural born citizen as required by our Constitution. After the general election, many of your constituents communicated with you asking that you request a proper investigation into the matter, but you chose not to.

I am not asking you to provide more of the same debunked misinformation and deception with which many representatives and senators chose to reply to those previous requests; they were lies then, so they’ll continue to be lies. What I am asking is for you merely to have a brief dialogue with the representatives of our movement to answer a simple question: Why didn’t you ask for the proof that so many of your constituents expected to be provided? Why did you think Barack Obama was constitutionally eligible to be president? Did you rely on the media for your decision? Did you just trust snopes.com and factcheck.org? Did you just believe that nobody could have ever been elected president without being properly vetted at some point in the process? Were you threatened? Were you provided with some communication directing you to ignore the inquiries?

Through this initiative, The WHY Initiative, those in our ever-growing movement are committed to two things regarding the elected officials who will not provide honest answers to their constituents: we will refuse to financially support any of their efforts, and we will work to see that those officials are removed from office through the election process. That would seem a steep price for you to pay when the alternative would be such an easy thing to do. And, we are not interested in speaking with any of your staffers. These answers should be answered by only you.

I don’t know about any of the other members of Congress, but I have confidence that you will be able to provide a legitimate answer to that question. In fact, I have such confidence in you that I am expecting you to do so.

To make arrangements to provide your answers, please make contact at either of these email addresses:

Citizen Wells: citizenwells@gmail.com
Dean Haskins: dhaskins@restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com

Or call: 434.525.1479

Thanking you in advance for your timely and forthright response.

Sincerely,

[NAME]
[CITY, STATE]

****************************************************
Here is an online resource with contact information for each state: http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/

Next, we’d like you to keep us posted about the contacts you are making, but rather than trying to keep up with, and categorize, countless emails, please keep us updated by posting your progress on our forum: http://www.restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php. If you haven’t registered, please do so—it’s quick and painless. There is a board on the forum labeled “Individual State Boards.” Once there, you’ll see your state’s individual board. Please post your updates there. If you would be interested in being a coordinator for your state, please let us know.

I would just like to express my gratitude for the many kind sentiments I’ve received while I’ve been ill. I cannot ever remember being so sick for so long. I am profoundly encouraged by how many of you are choosing to remain steadfast in this battle, and it is your mettle that gives me the desire to step back into the ring and fight for all I’m worth.

We WILL be heard!!!

God bless each of you.

Dean Haskins
Chairman, Restore the Constitutional Republic

From Citizen Wells:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation
or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
Congressional oath of office

“I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies,
foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to
the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental
reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully
discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.
So help me God.”
US Military officer’s oath of office

Officers in the service of the United States are
bound by this oath to disobey any order that
violates the Constitution of the United States.

Officers in the US Military and members of Congress take an oath of
office to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States
against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” To the surprise of no one,
members of the US Military take their oath seriously. Many members of
Congress were contacted before and after the presidential election.
To a person, all members contacted replied with political, evasive
and inaccurate statements about Barack Obama’s eligibility. Lt Col
Donald Sullivan, a retired Air Force officer, file a lawsuit in NC
on November 7, 2008. Now members of the military are coming on board
to support and defend the US Constitution and signing on as plaintiffs
in the Orly Taitz lawsuit.

The WHY initiative and other efforts are attempting to get straight
answers from congressmen as to why they believed Obama was eligible
and why no member of Congress stood up to challenge the Electoral
votes. Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama responded with a typical
absurd response when queried about Obama’s eligibility. Recently,
when interviewed, Senator Shelby gave a different response. Without
focusing on just one member of Congress, Senator Shelby, we still
need to find out what Senator Shelby’s position is on the US
Constitution.

Senator Shelby’s response

Senator Shelby, members of Congress, consider
the following officers in the US military
that have come on board to support and defend
the US Constitution:

 

“5.13.
It was well expected that, after all the public concern that has been
raised over the preceding months, Mr. Obama would have released for
public or official scrutiny the relevant documentation to back up his
claim of qualification as a “natural born citizen”. His reaction to
public concern and his recent actions in Federal District Court on
9/24/2008 demonstrate that Mr. Obama has no intentions of releasing
said documentation for review or cannot because they do not exist.
The late hour of this request was dictated by the delaying tactics
of Mr. Obama, and the non-responsiveness to citizens’ repeated
requests to the Obama campaign for proof of eligibility.”

Lt Col Donald Sullivan lawsuit

“I can present a long list of reasons, taken individually, which
convinced me NOT to vote for Barack Hussein Obama; his crime associates
in the USA, his lack of experience, the mystery of his citizenship,
his promise to make coal power industry bankrupt through excessive
regulations, his constant adjustment of position on issues, his tax
plan, his spread the wealth admission, his obvious socialistic goals,
his associations with foreign leaders unfriendly to the USA, the lies
he tells about a range of subjects including perhaps who his biological
father really is, his most recent revelation of having a “National
Security Force” (whatever that is)……………all of these says he is a person
of mystery, of no integrity, and in fact paints him with the same
narcissist paint of Hitler, Stalin, Saddam, Mao, and Kim Jong Ill.”

 Major General Carroll D. Childers Joins Orly Taitz lawsuit

 
“We the People of the United States of America” are entitled to know
the legal qualifications of the President and Commander in Chief.
For the better good and National Security of “We the People of the
United States” and for Absolute Command of the Military Forces of the
United States, I whole heartedly support the efforts of Dr. Orly Taitz,
ESQ for taking legal action to determine whether or not Barack Hussein
 Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, Citizen of Indonesia and possibly citizen
of Kenya, is eligible to become President of the United States and
Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces.

 Brigadier General Charles E. Jones Joins Orly Taitz lawsuit

“A Retired Colonel, Riley is “the recipient of the Silver Star, Legion
of Merit, Bronze Star and other awards and badges – including the
Combat Infantry Badge, Parachute Badge, and Army Staff Badge. He served
over 34 years in the US Army. He was commissioned as a 2LT in 1966 and
promoted to Colonel in 1989. He served in command positions from
Detachment through Battalion level and staff assignments from Brigade
to Chief of Staff Army level. He served two tours in Viet Nam and did
several tours in Germany.”

 Colonel Harry Riley Joins Orly Taitz lawsuit

“OCCUPATION: Retired (Disabled)….Combat Veteran

ACHIEVEMENTS: Awarded  Silver Star for Conspicuous Gallentry, Awarded
the Bronze Star with Combat “V”,Two (2) Purple Hearts, Gold Medal for
best Squad Leader in the World, 14 other awards and decorations”

Major James R. Cannon Joins Orly Taitz lawsuit

“As an active-duty Officer in the United States Army, I have grave
concerns about the constitutional eligibilty of Barack Hussein Obama
to hold the Office of President of The United States. He has
absolutely refused to provide to the American public his original
birth certificate, as well as other documents which may prove or
disprove his eligibility. In fact, he has fought every attempt made
by concerned citizens in their effort to force him to do so.
Until Mr. Obama releases a “vault copy” of his original birth
certificate for public review, I will consider him neither my
Commander in Chief nor my President, but rather, a usurper to the
Office - an impostor.
My conviction is such that I am compelled to join Dr. Orly Taitz’s
lawsuit, as a plaintiff, against Mr. Obama. As a citizen, it pains me
to do this, but as an Offficer, my sworn oath to support and defend
our Constitution requires this action.”

First Lt Scott R. Easterling Joins Orly Taitz lawsuit

Orly Taitz lawsuit and Military feedback

From Frank M. Connell, Jr.

Posted February 24th, 2009 by restore
I listened with amazement when the mainstream media, almost in unison, condemned the Venezuelan Congress for backing socialist President Hugo Chavez’s proposal to relegate presidential term limits to the scrap heap.  That action effectively ensconces Chavez as Venezuela’s dictator for life.

 

http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSN0256308220071102

 

Yet when similar efforts are undertaken in this country, the mainstream media doesn’t even find it newsworthy.

 

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=86324

 

 

As I’ve been saying for close to six months, just like his mentor Hugo Chavez, becoming this country’s first dictator for life is all part of Obama’s megalomaniacal plan.  The Chicagoization of Washington if you will.  And while the official name for the stimulus bill is the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, I have my own name for it:  the “keep liberals in power for life” bill. 

 

I keep hearing friends and media say, “Well, we’ll just vote him out of office after 4 years.”  Folks that will NEVER happen!  Obama WILL be re-elected in 4 years, and the liberals will expand their majorities in both Houses.  They will use massive voter fraud and various other frauds to make it happen.  And of course the “cowardice” Attorney General Eric Holder will aid and abet Obama in this endeavor.

 

Here are several things already afoot that will attempt to keep usurper Obama in the Oval Office for life.  And these are just the ones I know about.
 
***  As I mentioned above, legislation has already been proposed to repeal the 22nd Amendment (term limits).  Although it may not pass immediately, I believe it eventually will after Obama stocks the House & Senate with enough liberals (of the Marxist genre).  In a similar vain, Obama has also contacted some Democratic Senators about introducing legislation to amend the 10th amendment, which would prevent states from declaring sovereignty.  Seven states have already expressed an interest in doing so.

 

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=86324

***  The “keep liberals in power for life” bill funnels billions of dollars to ACORN and ACORN-like organizations.  In case you aren’t aware, community organizer extraordinaire Obama is ACORN, and ACORN, by aggressively expanding loans to low-income buyers, is largely responsible for the failures of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - which by extension brought the economy to its knees.  Obama has spent his entire professional life working for ACORN or its subsidiaries, representing ACORN as a lawyer on some of its most critical issues, and training ACORN leaders.
 
http://www.newswithviews.com/Ryter/jon271.htm
 
*** They will legalize 20 million illegal aliens (and probably their family members as well) and give them voting rights.  These illegals will of course be beholden to the party that gave them their citizenship.

 
http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/article.php?sid=930
 
***  They will grant Washington D.C. (which votes 90%/10% in favor of liberal candidates) the equivalent of statehood.  That will give the Senate 2 more ultra liberal senators, and give them extra House representatives with full voting privileges (currently D.C. representatives enjoy no such privileges).

 
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2008/12/dc-51st-state
 
***  Rahm Emanuel will implement Obama’s Civilian National Security Force - Obama’s version of the Gestapo.  This is part of a larger program to brainwash the youth of America.
 
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?v=e4qG6UIr8z
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPd0FK3LhBo
 
***  And here’s the biggie.  They will transfer control of the census to Rahm Emanuel.  That will give Emanuel unprecedented power to gerrymander congressional districts in favor of liberals.  He will also have the unfettered ability to fudge census figures in liberal cities and liberal states to funnel them even more federal pork.  He will also use the census numbers to give blue states even more Electoral College votes, and subtract Electoral College votes from red ones.

 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/02/09/gop-sounds-alarm-obama-decision-census-white-house/
 
***  And while I have seen no evidence of this yet, don’t be surprised to see the Obama administration make a push towards computerized voting.  Computerized voting is very prevalent today despite valid concerns regarding security.  Results from computerized voting are easily manipulated by hackers and the people who developed the software.  In other words, the people who write the software can simply pick the winner of an election with a few strokes on a keyboard (Watch the shocking Youtube video).

 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3hUPP_bdOo

 
Are you connecting the dots yet?  I have been warning of Obama’s grand ambitions well before the election, and everything that has transpired since Obama’s inauguration, I’m sad to say, confirms what I’ve suspected all along.  To me, all of this was very predictable.  Put simply, this is a coup d’état by a usurper who is most likely not even an American citizen.  And make no mistake about it.  Obama has every intention of being the America’s first dictator for life!

 

 

- Frank M. Connell, Jr.

Obama’s Agents At FactCheck.org

Posted February 17th, 2009 by restore

From the Obama File - http://theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm 

 I was recently engaged in an exchange of emails with my buddy Fred Nerks from Oz that prompted me to revisit FactCheck.org, where the Annenberg-funded website has published a web page entitled, “The truth about Obama’s birth certificate.”

The information on this page is 100% bovine excrement.

FactCheck.org’s Summary

1.  “In June, the Obama campaign released a digitally scanned image of his birth certificate…”

This statement is false — the campaign released a “Certification of Live Birth.”  The document presented on this website is not now and never has been a birth certificate, and FactCheck.org knows it.  So why did they publish this lie?

2.  “FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate.”

This statement is also a lie — the only people that have seen, touched, and examined Obama’s birth certificate is Chiyome Leinaala Fuikino M.D., the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, and the Registrar of Vital Statistics.

Fuikino wrote, “There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth certificate.  State law (Hawai’i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record.”

So your conclusion, “We conclude that…” is false, because your conclusions are based on a false premise — that you have seen Obama’s birth certificate — you haven’t, because the State of Hawaii won’t release it.  What do you think is going on in the 48 lawsuits against Obama.  These suits are all trying to get to Obama’s birth certificate and 48 times, judges have said, “I can’t go for that, ohh, no, I can’t go for that.”

3.  “Update, Nov. 1: The director of Hawaii’s Department of Health confirmed Oct. 31 that Obama was born in Honolulu.”

Complete fabrication and bold-faced lie — what Fuikino wrote was, “Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai’i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai’i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

Nowhere in that statement does it say Obama was born in Honolulu, and here is the complete statement:  — check it out yourself.

And, nowhere does FactCheck.org identify the militantly partisan website that released the “Certification of Live Birth” — The Daily Kos — one of the wackiest websites extant.  This FACT alone makes this entire scenario suspicious, if not patently ridiculous.

FactCheck.org’s Analysis

1.  FactCheck.org’s own analysis confirms what I wrote above, under Summary.

2.  FactCheck.org presents a photo of a “Certification of Live Birth,” captioned, “The Obama birth certificate, held by FactCheck writer Joe Miller.”

That’s a lie, as well — the document in this photo is a “Certification of Live Birth” (getting tiresome, isn’t it) — not a birth certificate.  They are different documents, and the folks at this  mendacious organization know the difference — Joseph Goebbels would be proud of FactCheck.org’s big lie. 

FactCheck.org presents a photo image of the document further down the page, under Analysis — That document is not a “birth certificate.”  It is a “Certification of Live Birth,” again, FactCheck.org knowingly misrepresents the document as something it is not, and it’s not even the document that was released.  

Here is the document that was released to The Daily Kos.  The original document released had its Certificate Number blacked out — and if one looks at the document, it says at the bottom, “ANY ALTERATIONS INVALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE” — even if the document were genuine — it isn’t VALID.

3.  FactCheck.org published several other images defending its false presentation on this page.

4.  In late July, a researcher looking to dig up dirt on Obama instead found a birth announcement that had been published in the Honolulu Advertiser on Sunday, Aug. 13, 1961.

A birth announcement could have been easily phoned in to the newspaper from anywhere in the world.  This “fact” is inconclusive, unless you know who provided the newspaper with the announcement, the means they used, and where they were physically located at the time.

FactCheck.org’s Anal-ists

FactCheck.org identifies their anal-ists as Jess Henig and Joe Miller.  OK, that’s fine, but who and what are Jess Henig and Joe Miller?  Are they qualified to make an analysis of ANY document, or are they just a couple of guys hanging around FactCheck.org’s office, or are they political operators?  What are their bona fides?  FactCheck.org doesn’t say.  Wonder why?

FactCheck does say their, “representatives got a chance to spend some time with the birth certificate, and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago.”  In my mind, that clearly shows they were working with and for the Obama Campaign and that Obama and his people are involved in this lie.

Lie?  Hell, this is a conspiracy and FactCheck.org boldly admits their part in it.

I prefer to give credence to Dr. Ron Polarik, who holds a Ph.D. in Instructional Media and specializes in computer graphics with over 20 years experience with computers, printers and typewriters, who provides conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) image created and distributed by Obama’s campaign to the Daily Kos, Annenberg’s Factcheck, and the St. Petersburg Times, and Politifact, is, unquestionably, a false identification document.  Here, is his final report.

A second expert forensic document examiner Ms. Sandra Ramsey Lines has filed an affidavit  associated with one of the lawsuits, stating the following:

1. I am Sandra Ramsey Lines, With an address at…  I am a former federal examiner and law enforcement officer.  I began training as a forensic document examiner in 1991.  I am a Certified Diplomat of Forensic Sciences, a member of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, a member of the Southwestern Association of Forensic Document Examiners, and a member of the Questioned Document Subcommittee of the American Society of Testing and Materials.  My background and credentials are set forth in Exhibit I attached hereto.

2. I have reviewed the attached affidavit posted on the internet from “Ron Polarik.”  After my review and based on my years of experience, I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “Factcheck.org” and others cannot be relied upon as genuine. 

My Comments

Since the title of the FactCheck.org web page is, “The truth about Obama’s birth certificate,” everything on the page is a bold-faced lie, because FactCheck.org has never, ever seen Obama’s birth certificate and every image and reference is to a Certification of Live Birth.

Hawaii is notorious for its issuance of COLB’s.  Click here to see a large copy of a beautifully printed Certificate of Hawaiian Birth (If you click it, it will get bigger or smaller).  It belongs to Sun Yat-Sen, the Father of Modern China, who was born in China.  

This Certificate of Hawaiian Birth, dated March 14, 1904, was issued after Dr. Sun signed a raggedy type-written statement affirming that he was born in Hawaii on Nov. 24, 1870.  Sun Yat-sen was born on November 12, 1866, to a peasant family in the village of Cuiheng, Xiangshan county , Guangzhou prefecture, Guangdong province (26 km or 16 miles north of Macau), not Hawaii, as this document affirms.

We know Maya Soetoro-Ng, Obama’s sister has a Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth too, and she was born in Jakarta, Indonesia.

None of this is surprising, since this website is funded by the same fine people who fund Obama’s buddy, the unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers. They represent themselves as unbiased and non-partisan. That, of course, is just another lie.

This “birth certificate” controversy is not nearly as important as the fact that Obama is not a “natural born citizen.”

“To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed…”

George Orwell, “Nineteen Eighty-Four”

The WHY initiative is a new movement that evolved out of efforts by the Citizen Wells blog US Constitution Hall of Shame and Democratic Disaster (now Restore the Constitutional Republic) and others to inform congressmen before the general election and before Congress certified the Electoral College votes.

We are taking this effort nationwide and will be asking for volunteers. Our initial efforts are to get some straight answers on Obama’s eligibility and upholding the US Constitution. This will continue on through the 2010 election cycle and beyond. We must hold Congress accountable to the US Constitution and American people.

 

Here are some exerpts from restore-the-constitutional-republic-sue-myrick-jim-demint-senators-representatives/">The WHY Initiative: Holding Congress Accountable

 

Prologue

“I am writing this as a concerned American, not as a Democrat, Republican, Independent or other political position. I dislike modern political parties, although in honesty, I am more disgusted with the modern day Democrat party. We need more statesmen, less politics and putting America first. I promise you I will go after Republicans with the same veracity that I question Democrats.

 

You, I and most Americans have let this happen. Like the frog slowly cooking in a pot of water, not realizing that it is being cooked, we have allowed our institutions, like Congress and the Judicial as well as the MSM, to cook our brains into a stupor of submission. Television screens, just like the screens in the homes of “1984″ have brought us just the “news” that the modern day Big Brother, the Obama Camp, wants us to hear. Revisionist history and adoration of Big Brother.

 

The changes in this country did not occur overnight and our attempts to restore obedience to the US Constitution and responsible institutions will take time and effort. We have been given a wake up call. Just as the “shot heard round the world” was a wake up call for the patriots of the American Revolution, we must sieze this unique moment in history and rise to the occasion. We have seen what will happen if we choose to do otherwise. Join us in making Congress accountable to the American public.”

 

From the Mario Apuzzo lawsuit

 

“110. When so much doubt has been expressed in the public arena about Obama’s eligibility to be President, Congress had a duty to investigate and confirm for the sake of the Constitution and the plaintiffs and other American people which it represents if Obama is so qualified by holding a Congressional hearing and investigation on the matter with full subpoena power. Endnote 17.”

 

From Dean Haskins:

 

“The Death of Common Sense

 

The Birth of The WHY Initiative”

 

“Exactly when did common sense die in this country? Obviously, it has been on life support for some time; but now that our collective national synapses have stopped firing, we aren’t even in an era of philosophical “gray.””

 

“By now, those reading this have likely heard all the constitutional reasoning regarding the ineligibility of the UPOTUS (Unconstitutional President of the United States).  However, in spite of our undaunted pleas to our elected officials, it appears they continue to suffer a profound inability to discern between truth and fiction. In response to the many inquiries they have received, they continue to reply with faulty logic, misinformation, and outright lies.  And, we are becoming more and more aware of the fact that many, if not all, of our correspondence with them has never even reached them.  There is a fortified firewall between the elected officials and their constituents. 

That moat is commonly referred to as “staffers.”  I have been told that many of the staffers simply toss the inquiries, and their bosses never even see them.

From the many replies that people have received from the offices of elected officials (for I am now very careful not to say that they are actual responses from the officials themselves), there is an Orwellian pattern of damaged brain matter in their words.  Here are some of the more common blights of misinformation being proffered by this inexplicable class of political zombies:”

 

Read more here:

 

restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/?p=94">http://blog.restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/?p=94

 
We have created a new blog, Congress Watch, to place not only the dialogue we have with congressmen during the WHY Initiative, but going forward into and beyond the 2010 Elections. We will also put information there to help convince congressmen that we do indeed have a constitutional crisis with a usurper as president. Letters of support and concern from the military will be posted as well as efforts throughout the country to get congressmen to listen to their constituents and obey the US Constitution.

 

We have already been in touch with concerned citizens and other internet sites. Congress Watch belongs to the people just as the US Constitution belongs to the people. We are seeking involvement from other bloggers, internet sites and concerned Americans to help in this endeavor. Sadly, our best efforts, hurried as they were before the general election and Congress convening, fell on deaf  ears. That will not happen this time. Their apathy, arrogance or other defects will be met with resolve of knowing that many of them will seek reelection in 2010. They cannot ignore us for very long.

 

We now have time to organize properly. We will get by congressional aides to get answers from congressmen. A team of “experts” will be available to answer questions in a professional manner, but we will not accept defeat. We will demand straight answers from congressmen.

 

What can you do to help?

 

Dean Haskins, who became chairman of Restore the Constitutional Republic in January, has reorganized and secured the website as a .com. We are requesting that those who want to organize state efforts or assist to get the attention of their congressmen go there and sign up:

 

restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/">http://www.restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com

 

The efforts to get the attention of congressmen will be more orderly than past efforts. We realize that the people of each state are more apt to have insights into the office hours and local meeting habits of their elected officials. We will have our “experts” available as needed. The experts will not be intimidated.

 

We are also asking for volunteers to help with Congress Watch. Once again, we have short term and long term goals, however the objective is always the same, holding Congress accountable. Bloggers, internet sites or concerned citizens, if you would like to help keep Congress Watch up to date with information on congressmen and nationwide initiatives, leave a comment on the blog:

 

http://congresswatch.wordpress.com/

 

We must seize the moment to regain trust in government and control of this country.

 

God bless.

 

Another Follow-Up to Senator DeMint’s Staffer

Posted February 12th, 2009 by restore

Dear Mr. Headley,

I hope you are doing well.  Because I haven’t heard back from you since my last post of a week or so ago, I did want to provide you with an update on this situation. 

 

At the onset, let me say that I guess I may have been a bit naïve in the belief that Senator DeMint’s relationship with my late brother would have afforded me an opportunity to engage in a forthright dialogue with him regarding why he chose not to fully investigate Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be president.  While the answers you supplied seem to indicate that he relied on no actual evidence at all, I was disheartened that the Senator chose not even to reply to me.  At this point, I’m not certain the Senator even saw my request.

 

A colleague of mine, Citizen Wells, has been making similar requests of NC Rep. Sue Myrick, and the result of the ambiguous replies we’ve received in our two inquiries has led to the creation of The WHY Initiative.  Since, through our network of organizations and bloggers, we have fairly immediate access to countless thousands of people across the country, we are spearheading this grassroots effort to be heard by our elected officials—and to hear directly from them, and not their staffers (no disrespect intended).  We will not relent until we get some meaningful answers instead of the Obama camp’s talking points with which the staffers have obviously been provided.

 

Now, how serious are we about this?  Let’s take a look.

 

After our brief exchange last week, I wrote an article detailing it:

 

restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/?p=86">http://blog.restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/?p=86

 

Citizen Wells did as well:

 

restore/">http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/02/11/senator-jim-demint-united-states-senator-sc-senator-ian-headley-aide-headley-obama-ineligible-us-constitution-congress-electoral-votes-south-carolina-constituents-the-why-initiative-restore/

 

Then, we called upon faithful patriots across our nation to help us disseminate this information.  Is it working?  Well, again, let’s take a look.

 

Mr. Headley, please do a Google search on your name:

 

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ian+headley

 

As of this writing, Citizen Wells’ article ranks third.

 

Now do a Google search of your name, adding “jim demint”:

 

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ian+headley+jim+demint

 

As of this writing, that article is Google’s first entry.

 

The voting public IS going to learn the truth—one way or another.

 

Through The WHY Initiative we are going to continue to insist that we receive real answers from those we elected to represent us.  State by state, we will be working to inform the voting public of just how (un)responsive their elected officials are to them.  No answers?  No campaign $upport and no votes.  If those in office will not answer to We the People, then they simply should not be in office.

 

Moreover, we’re not asking for Senator DeMint, or any other elected official, to supply their answers to the public at large; we are asking that they simply enter into a meaningful dialogue with the representatives of The WHY Initiative.

 

I’ll admit that our country is presently in a shambles, and the current administration is working to destroy all we hold dear; but, the position of the restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/">organization I chair, as well as scores of other groups, is that this administration is not even a constitutionally valid one, so every piece of this administration’s agenda is criminally fraudulent, and ultimately inconsequential to our great nation.  Once the truth is embraced, this constitutional disaster should end up in our history books as nothing more than a footnote.

 

Just look at what this UPOTUS (Unconstitutional President of the US) and his Democratic cronies are doing.  They are applying their subversive agenda to assure that conservatives will have no meaningful voice in this country for several years.  Why in the world would any truly patriotic statesman not yell to the top of his lungs that there is a constitutional problem that needs to be addressed by Congress?  Exposing the fraud not only exposes the UPOTUS, but also those who were complicit in his crimes (the DNC).  Those who would act on behalf of our Constitution are virtually guaranteed re-election, and historically, will be regarded as heroes.

 

By the way, we have established a new repository of information regarding our elected officials’ lack of due diligence in this matter.  It bears an appropriate name: CongressWatch (http://congresswatch.wordpress.com).

 

Please, Mr. Headley, do not think that I am merely capitalizing on Senator DeMint’s relationship with my late brother, or that I’m trading on Terry’s legacy.  In his short 45-year lifespan, Terry Haskins embraced truth, and truth is something we’re simply not receiving.  I am persuaded that my brother would have led this effort for the preservation of our Constitution.  He never shrank from what was truly important.

 

You’re a nice guy; but now, I want to speak with the Senator.

 

Kindest regards,

 

Dean Haskins

Chairman, Restore the Constitutional Republic

 

P.S.  This article is also being widely published.

The Death of Common Sense

Posted February 8th, 2009 by restore

The Death of Common Sense

 

The Birth of The WHY Initiative

Dean Haskins

 

Exactly when did common sense die in this country?  Obviously, it has been on life support for some time; but now that our collective national synapses have stopped firing, we aren’t even in an era of philosophical “gray.”  What is presently being foisted upon us is the notion that black is white and white is black.  And, don’t even think about reducing that statement to race. Political correctness is only political; there is nothing correct about it.

 

Think about it.  We’re being told that the way to save our economy is to spend money we don’t have on things we don’t need.  How, exactly, will that save our economy?  That’s somewhat like telling me that, if my credit card debt has gotten a little out of hand, the way to fix the problem is to exhaust every line of credit I have on bagged ice and tanks of helium.  Certainly, I could throw a massive party, but once the ice has melted and the balloons are popped, who’s going to want to stick around to help clean up?  And, then, more importantly, what am I supposed to do with the debt I’ll likely not be able to pay off in my lifetime?  Common sense unquestionably prevents me from such foolish behavior.

 

For a few decades now, Muslims have been committing focused acts of terror around the globe, including the worst attack on American soil in our nation’s history.  But, we’re allowing Islam to be forced down the throats of western civilization at an unprecedented rate.  Why?  Because Muslims love our way of life so much, and desire to see us prosper and flourish?  Give me a break.  Islam is committed to wiping out western civilization—Muslims have no choice in the matter because it’s commanded in their Koran.  Any Muslim who tells you otherwise is practicing their doctrine of Taqqiya—a convenient little precept that allows them to lie about their beliefs in order to advance the cause of Islam (i.e., Barack Obama is a Christian).

 

You see, according to the tenets of the Judeo-Christian ethic upon which our country was founded, we are taught to embrace truth; we are not to lie, even pragmatically to advance our particular beliefs.  But, how is it that we were viciously attacked, some 3,000 of our citizens were killed, and our Commander-in-Chief took to the airwaves to proclaim, “Islam is a religion of peace?”  I suppose he had just eaten the worm at the bottom of that bottle of Taqqiya. 

 

We’ve allowed tolerance to be transformed from a virtue to vice.  We’ve permitted our general goodwill to be turned into ammunition in the rifle of Islam.

 

Because of our inane, cowardly PC promulgation, we have unwittingly welcomed those, whose highest desire is to destroy us, to demand that we accommodate the rituals of the very doctrines that mandate our destruction.  Black is white; white is black.  The Bible describes it as “calling evil good and good evil.”    But, wasn’t it such a nice “I’d-like-to-teach-the-world-to-sing” moment to see Nancy Pelosi holding a Koran for Keith Ellison to place his hand on to swear his constitutional oath? But, was that oath actually to defend the Constitution, or was it to uphold his version of “scripture” that commands him to destroy anyone who doesn’t follow Islam?  However one wishes to understand this twaddle, one thing is certain, it possesses not a single drop of common sense.

 

Black is white.  White is black.  Black is white.  White is black.  Yes we can.  YES WE CAN!

 

Enter stage left: an eloquent atrocity.

 

By now, those reading this have likely heard all the constitutional reasoning regarding the ineligibility of the UPOTUS (Unconstitutional President of the United States).  However, in spite of our undaunted pleas to our elected officials, it appears they continue to suffer a profound inability to discern between truth and fiction.

 

In response to the many inquiries they have received, they continue to reply with faulty logic, misinformation, and outright lies.  And, we are becoming more and more aware of the fact that many, if not all, of our correspondence with them has never even reached them.  There is a fortified firewall between the elected officials and their constituents.  That moat is commonly referred to as “staffers.”  I have been told that many of the staffers simply toss the inquiries, and their bosses never even see them.

 

From the many replies that people have received from the offices of elected officials (for I am now very careful not to say that they are actual responses from the officials themselves), there is an Orwellian pattern of damaged brain matter in their words.  Here are some of the more common blights of misinformation being proffered by this inexplicable class of political zombies:

 

Because lawsuits have been filed that have made it to the Supreme Court, and those cases were ultimately dismissed, Barack Obama is a natural born citizen.

 

Understanding that the dismissal of all those cases had nothing to do with the merits of the cases, but rather whether or not the person(s) bringing the case had standing to do so, that argument is patently insufficient regarding the UPOTUS’ constitutional eligibility.  However, some of our elected officials are proclaiming that to be the extent of their evidentiary fact-finding missions.  Yeah, evidentiary . . . but with no actual evidence (black is white).

 

Because “independent” websites snopes.com and factcheck.org have verified the [forged] COLB to be authentic, Barack Obama is a natural born citizen.

 

I don’t think I even need to comment on how ludicrous this claim is.

 

Because Hawaiian officials verified that he was, indeed, born in Hawaii, then Barack Obama is a natural born citizen.

 

Did any of these political undead even bother to read what those Hawaiian officials actually said?  Granted, the extremely liberal Hawaiian officials craftily performed some brilliant doublespeak, but they said that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii just as much as Tim Geithner faithfully filled out his 1040s.

 

Because Chief Justice Roberts swore him in, Barack Obama is a natural born citizen.

 

And because I say my Mazda is a Lamborghini, I have the coolest car in town.  Wake me up when the stupid wears off.

 

I could go on and on with the hopenchange slathered rhetoric, but it just wears me out.  Back when I was in grade school, and “special education” actually meant something, we all just tolerantly allowed those kids, many of whom wore leather helmets, to say whatever they wanted to say without consequence.  Yeah, we may have shamefully retreated to privately laugh at their sad conditions; but we had no problem allowing them to state completely absurd things simply because they had a physical calamity that precluded common sense.

 

This may seem trite and crude, but never once would we have considered voting any of those unfortunate children into positions in which they would represent our best interests and defend our constitution.  I truly do pity the predicaments of those very kindhearted individuals; but I’ve become quite perturbed at the intellectual waterheads who presently serve in Congress.  And I’m not just talking about the “bad” ones.  Not one of those individuals who are blessed to serve our country in such a capacity had the fortitude to exercise their constitutionally mandated due diligence.  Not one.

 

So, Citizen Wells and I, with the help of patriots across this great land, are launching The WHY Initiative.  We are going to pursue the greatest unanswered question in modern history—why didn’t you believe it was necessary to demand actual proof that Barack Obama is constitutionally eligible to be our president?  It certainly isn’t because we didn’t ask you to.  And based on the responses we’ve received, it is obvious you don’t even have a clue about the facts.  So, why didn’t you ask?

 

This is a singularly important question, for I believe it will give a glimpse of the depth of corruption that exists in our government to all the smelly tourists across our country.  In the meantime, I would simply ask each of you to do something.  Whenever you enter into discourse about this constitutional crisis, exercise the one thing that will defeat the arguments of those who do not believe it is imperative that Barack Obama provide proof that he is eligible to occupy the Oval Office—common sense.  While our nation, as a whole, has lost its ability to reason, that doesn’t mean you have as well.  Common sense may have died in our national discourse, but that doesn’t mean it is privately dead.  Exercise your common sense.  Ask WHY?

 

We will be providing you with much more information about The WHY Initiative very soon.  Please check back often.

 

For more about our initiative, read Citizen Wells’ salient article here: http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/02/07/us-congress-us-constitution-obama-not-eligible-20th-amendment-citizen-wells-restore-the-constitutional-republic-sue-myrick-jim-demint-senators-representatives/

My Dialogue with SC Senator Jim DeMint’s Office

Posted February 6th, 2009 by restore

I recently had an interesting exchange with one of SC Senator Jim DeMint’s staffers.  Now, understand, as far as legislators go, I think Senator DeMint is one of the better ones we have; however, on this particular issue, he appears to be either as uniformed, or as willfully negligent, as the rest of them.  At this point, I’m not sure which.  And I say that, understanding that it is possible he is not even aware this exchange even occurred (although I’d be surprised if, by my last two posts to him, Mr. Headley didn’t alert Senator DeMint of the “situation” he had just created). 

 

Some of us are now wondering just how many of our communications actually make it to the elected officials to whom we write.  It looks like the staffers provide quite a firewall between their bosses and We the People.

 

If this weren’t such a tragically dire situation for our country, it would be quite humorous.  It seems Mr. Headley wasn’t in the mood for a logical argument, but he obviously got a nice workout dancing around my questions.

 

So, see if you can tell where a bit of rudimentary logic pulled the wheels off his wagon.

 

Note: I start my letter by referencing my late brother who, until his death in 2000, was the Speaker Pro Tem of the SC State House.  He died of cancer at age 45.

 

********

Dear Senator DeMint:

 

By way of introduction, I am Terry Haskins’ brother.  I live in Virginia, and work in music production, ad and website design, and writing.  I am also the chairman of restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.org/">Restore the Constitutional Republic.  I pray that I may gain your consideration in this matter, simply because I understand you respected my brother, as he did you.  Before this last election cycle, I have never been a political “activist,” however, this issue has grabbed my attention, and I believe that, if he were alive today, Terry would have heartily joined me in the profound concern I have in this.

 

By now, I’m sure you are aware of the growing mass of concerned citizens throughout the U.S. who have legitimate questions about Mr. Obama’s natural born citizen status.  Many volunteers in several organizations worked tirelessly to provide the members of Congress with the pertinent information, and since you’ve recently been included as a defendant in one of the many lawsuits that have been filed across the country (Kerchner v. Obama), I’m sure you are aware of the constitutional issues that are being raised.

 

Senator DeMint, we are not conspiracy theorists, and we do not don tinfoil hats, as the liberal mainstream media would have everyone believe.  We are just everyday citizens who know something is not right, and who highly regard our Constitution.  I believe that you are a very intelligent person, but I don’t believe it even takes that much common sense to understand that someone doesn’t hire high-priced law firms to battle dozens of lawsuits if he does not desire to keep the very thing being asked for hidden.  There is obviously something on that document he does not want us to know—as well as all the other documentation he has sealed from public scrutiny.

 

That being said, this letter is really not intended as a vehicle by which to defend or expound the numerous claims that are being proffered.  This letter is more of a personal request.

 

I am in fairly frequent contact with many of the leaders of this grassroots movement, and, frankly, we have been dumbstruck at the obvious lack of inquest by any of our elected officials.  We know many of those leaders to have been quite vocal about unpopular matters in the past, and we are now trying to understand why not one member of Congress uttered even a whimper about this.

 

We know there must be a reason, and that is the purpose of this letter.  We would like an opportunity to sit down with you, face to face, and have you explain to us why this bizarre series of events unfolded as it did.  There simply must have been something that prevented an honest, open discussion about this, and we’d certainly appreciate knowing what that was.

 

I look forward to your response.

 

For our Constitution,

 

Dean C. Haskins

restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.org/">www.restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.org

www.deanhaskins.com

 

P.S.  I don’t know if you are aware that I designed a website in Terry’s memory.  If you haven’t seen it, it is located at www.terryhaskins.com

 

********

Mr. Haskins,

 

Thank you for your note.  Your brother meant so much to so many of us in South Carolina.  One of the highest points of Senator DeMint’s career was receiving the Terry Haskins award from the SC Republican Party.

 

I heard from Senator Thomas’ office and appreciate you contacting me.

 

I cannot speak for other Members of Congress and neither can Senator DeMint.  However, Senator DeMint has looked into the claims with regard to Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of President.  Multiple court cases have reached the Supreme Court, through the legal framework of our nation.  Each case has since been dismissed.  It appears from all evidence available, the President was qualified under the Constitution for Congress to certify the electoral college vote.

 

You would need to contact other Members of Congress, if you have questions about their thoughts and actions on this issue.  Neither I, nor Senator DeMint, are in a position to explain their actions.

 

I wish you all the best, and encourage you to keep fighting to have the right policies implemented in our nation.

 

Sincerely,

 

Ian Headley

 

********

Mr. Headley,

 

Thank you so much for your speedy reply.  I genuinely appreciate it.  I would also like to express my gratitude for your kind sentiments about my brother.  I still miss him very much.

 

Please know that I mean absolutely no disrespect here, but your response is precisely the type of misinformation about which I spoke.  Since none of the cases dealing with the natural born issue have even had their merits heard, what standard of truth did Senator DeMint use to determine that Mr. Obama is, indeed, a natural born citizen?  Each of those cases was dismissed over issues of “standing.”  One can determine nothing of the merits of a case when it is dismissed on a procedural technicality.  Has Senator DeMint physically verified something to which nobody else has had access?

 

And, since the only proof Mr. Obama has proffered to date has been verified by two separate forensic document examiners to be a forgery, again, I ask, what is Senator DeMint’s standard of truth?  Please see this.

 

Your statement also seems to imply that there are presently no active lawsuits, which is simply not true.  Please look here.  In addition to the fact that Senator DeMint is one of the defendants in a procedurally active case (Kerchner v. Obama), please know that there continue to be new actions filed.

 

Please watch my video dealing with this issue here.

 

Mr. Headley, what has happened to common sense?  It appears no longer to exist.

 

Kindest regards,

 

Dean Haskins

 

********

Mr. Headley,

 

I just wanted to follow up and ask if I can expect an answer from either you or Senator DeMint regarding what specific evidence Senator DeMint used to determine, conclusively, that Barack Obama is a natural born citizen, since none of the dismissed cases had any of their merits heard.  I’m sure you can understand my concern, because a plaintiff not having standing to bring a case is certainly not the same thing as evidence being weighed by a court.  Your previous response seemed to indicate that Senator DeMint determined that Barack Obama is a natural born citizen simply because the Supreme Court believed the plaintiff’s were not legally able to have their cases heard. 

 

Please provide the evidence that Senator DeMint used to come to the conclusion he did.

 

Thank you,

 

Dean Haskins

 

********

Mr. Haskins,

 

I understand you are not satisfied with the results of the various unsuccessful court cases with regard to this issue.

 

However, you initiated this communication stating, “this letter is really not intended as a vehicle by which to defend or expound the numerous claims that are being proffered.”

 

Relying on your statement, I did not intend my response to engage in a discussion about the finer points of said ‘numerous claims’, nor will I do so now.

 

I believe my original response was clear as to the questions Senator DeMint is capable of answering.

 

I wish you all the best.

 

Sincerely,

 

Ian Headley

 

********

Mr. Headley,

 

I apologize that I apparently have not communicated well, and there seems to be a bit of a “disconnect” between us.  My statements have nothing to do with my level of “satisfaction” about the outcomes of cases that have been dismissed; merely that those “outcomes” had nothing to do with the natural born citizenship issue—only whether or not the court believed the person(s) bringing the cases had standing to do so.

 

And, I am not “defending or expounding the numerous claims that are being proffered;” I am simply asking for you to explain your original answer.  You said,

 

However, Senator DeMint has looked into the claims with regard to Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of President.  Multiple court cases have reached the Supreme Court, through the legal framework of our nation.  Each case has since been dismissed.  It appears from all evidence available, the President was qualified under the Constitution for Congress to certify the electoral college vote.”

 

To which I questioned what the evidence was that Senator DeMint used to determine that Obama is a natural born citizen, other than the various plaintiffs’ ineligibility to have their cases heard (which, again, is not evidence of natural born citizenship).  Having provided no additional information about evidence, your statement could easily be understood to be that Senator DeMint actually relied on no evidence whatsoever by which to come to his conclusion.

 

If that is what you are saying, then I will accept it at face value.  And, I actually already suspected that to be the case.  That is what prompted my original request for a conversation with Senator DeMint, to determine why he chose not to demand that evidence be provided, knowing that there were so many unanswered questions surrounding the issue.  I believe that the truth should be within the scope of answers Senator DeMint is capable of providing, and it appears you have now provided that.

 

Thank you,

 

Dean Haskins

 

********

Mr. Headley,

 

I certainly did not desire to end our discussion on such a disagreeable tone; although, with just a bit of elementary logic, you should be able to see the fundamental flaws in your answers to me.  Actually, yours is not all that different from the numerous other replies we’ve received from the offices of Congress members. 

 

It truly is a sad commentary that none of our elected officials actually bothered to ask for the most basic proof that Barack Obama is constitutionally eligible to be our president.  We firmly believe he is not, and he continues to obfuscate anything that might possibly prove us wrong.  And my reason for contacting Senator DeMint was to find out exactly what his reasoning was not even to ask for such basic proof.  It’s not as if the members of Congress weren’t alerted about the problem, for we have people across this country who sent them certified letters, and then retained the documentation proving their letters were sent.

 

The 20th Amendment states, “If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified . . .” Obviously, our forefathers envisioned a scenario in which someone would have attained the status of “President elect,” and then failed to qualify.  That would mean that, after he won the Electoral College vote, the founding fathers expected the members of Congress to verify that he was constitutionally qualified.  That simply did not happen with Barack Obama.

 

And we now believe we are in the midst of a constitutional crisis; hence the continued legal challenges, and the growing swell of military personnel (active and veteran) who are demanding this calamity be addressed.

 

Please don’t get me wrong, I admire and respect Senator DeMint.  I believe he is a fine statesman, and that is why I continue to labor over these communications.  In light of the fact that he is one of the many named defendants in Kerchner v. Obama, I believe Senator DeMint is in a singular position to get in front of this matter and lead our country out of this disaster. 

 

Senator DeMint could start a process to right this wrong by immediately calling for a congressional investigation into this matter.  He could declare to the joint houses of Congress that “We have erred by not exercising our constitutionally prescribed due diligence in this.”  Certainly, you can see the personal legal benefits he could derive from such actions; but, more importantly, he would go down in the annals of history as the one true patriot who actually fought for our Constitution.

 

I still desire to have a conversation with him.

 

For our Constitution,

 

Dean Haskins

Chairman, restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.org/">Restore the Constitutional Republic

434.525.1479

 

 

 

 

My Follow-Up Letter to Glenn Beck

Posted February 3rd, 2009 by restore

Mr. Beck,

I found it sadly ironic that on today’s show you decried the lack of media attention regarding the tragedy that is occurring in Mexico at the hands of the drug lords.  Indeed, it is a tragedy that thousands of people have lost their lives.  How much greater a tragedy is it that nobody in the media will even allow an honest, open discussion about the constitutional issues surrounding Mr. Obama’s ineligibility to be the president of this country?  That tragedy encompasses hundreds of thousands of our citizens who have lost their lives while upholding their oaths to defend our constitution.

Why is it that you are so fearful of even having a truthful conversation about it?  We tried to get your attention over the weekend by sending you a few emails.  All we are asking is for you to have a conversation about it–and we are not even asking that it be done on air (for we have no desire to publicly embarrass you when you finally realize the seriousness of this crisis).

This plea will be posted on forums and blogs across the internet, as there are many people waiting to hear if you will finally enter into this dialogue.

Are you willing, yet, to talk?

Kindest regards,

Dean Haskins
Chairman, Restore the Constitutional Republic
restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/">http://www.restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/

tag?